|
Love and Illusion 
The Hindi word for illusion is maya. The English
word for illusion is love. I have proof.
An Indian friend of mine in London was completely ga-ga over a girl in
his office. He sent her enormous Valentine cards which he signed, “Your
Baby Bhagwan”. He sent her flowers and chocolates - which would
arrive at the office in huge wicker baskets with frills and bows - and
on one occasion, a live puppy.
He was dying of love while she was dying of embarrassment. But he persisted
and she relented, and he stretch-limoed her to a series of Punjabi hotspots
all over town. One night, they were spotted smooching in the Boob-Ooze
Club in Soho, and a week later she moved into his flat, which was full
of idols, incense, and questionable herbs.
A year later, he discovered she was having an affair with Prendergast
from the purchasing department. My Indian friend was hearbroken, soul-beaten,
deflated, morose, and then couldn’t decide how he felt. But finally
he settled on revenge. He nailed a poster of his cheating girlfrind’s
face on trees all around his neighbourhood bearing the caption: “HAVE
YOU SEEN THIS DOG?”
She subsequently went around her forest of humiliation ripping them down,
and then decided to ring the immigration department.
The last I heard of him, he was back in Delhi and his parents had him
engaged to a Gujurati girl, aged eight.
Love, maya, all is illusion.
It is said that bookshops have romantic potential. So I got a job in one.
the work was fun, the wages were hilarious. I was told that the customer
is always right. So I asked the manager, “If we can’t smack
the children, can we at least belt the parents?” No, I certainly
could not. Oh.
So I used to lie in wait by the romantic airport novels for single ladies.
They all eyed me suspiciously, and one complained to the manager that
a pervert was lurking near the Mills and Boon stand. Absolute maya, madam.
It’s an illusion, it wasn’t me.
But I soon discovered that the only love to be found in a bookshop was
not under the covers, but between them. According to one major bookseller,
humanity has varied reasons to frequent these establishments.
A survey revealed that: 20% are waiting for someone, 3% are hiding from
someone, 20% are waiting for it to stop raining, 5% are lost, 10% are
thinking about stealing a book, 10% are looking in awe at the artwork
on the covers, another 15% are looking in awe at the prices on the covers,
10% are looking for girls, and 1% are looking at the people who are looking
for girls - which leaves the princely total of 7% who might actually get
around to buying a book.
An intellectually undernourished actor from Hollywood once said something
quite perceptive: “Chasing women is fine and fun, but it’s
when you actually catch one that the problems start.”
His fear was not of commitment, but of entrapment. He may be on to something
there, but then he’s divorced and dead - which proves that even
mortality is maya.
On Valentine’s Day last year, I was with a bunch of friends at a
restaurant on Silom. The air was heavy with mashed, karaoked ballads that
should only be let out with a license very quietly on Valentine’s
Day, but which are played incessantly all night long and all year round
in this city. Everyone in the room had a mobile phone which they shouted
into periodically - probably at each other. The beautiful girl from next
door, who has a body that pops thermometers, was sitting next to her new
boyfriend from Noo Yawk.
“You’ll like this guy,” she said. “He’s
a b*****d’s b*****d.”
To me he was just another ego in a wig. They were soon entwined and valentined
at the table, and I was sitting on the other side of her - ignored and
desperate. He swaggered to the microphone and from the jungle of my lungs
I blurted out to her, “Can I marry your hair?”
She gave me that, did-you-just-say-something-look, as the words hung in
the lucent air . . .
The Noo Yawker was still murdering “My Way” when I started
drinking the ashtray.
Some enchanted evening. Thank God all is maya.
By Roger Beaumont
Available
at Bookazine
A walk in the countryside
... led to violent death for Diana Davidson
By David Cocksedge
IN THE SWELTERING summer of 1969, the sleepy village
of Paddock Wood was sweetly perfumed with new-mown hay. This rural village
in Kent, England was quiet as usual on the Sunday afternoon of 20 July.
On the village green, a cricket match was being played between the local
team, known as the 'Mad Hatters' and an opposing village team. At two o'clock
Sean Galbally, a member of the Mad Hatters team, drove up in his sports
car accompanied by his attractive girlfriend, Diana Davidson (21).
The young lady sat with friends watching the game, but then sometime between
5.30 and 5.40pm she became bored and left the green to go for a walk. Her
friends knew that she did not especially enjoy watching cricket matches
and often went for long walks in the beautiful local countryside - the county
of Kent is known as 'The garden of England'.
Diana worked at the Ministry of Defence and Development at Fort Halstead,
near Sevenoaks, and lived with her family in Otford. On this day she was
wearing a very short mini-dress coloured in orange and pink stripes. Only
three people noticed her leave the cricket green and they were among the
last to see her alive.
When Ms Davidson failed to return at close of play after 6.30pm, both cricket
teams and their supporters made a search of the area and eventually Sean
Galbally reported her missing to the local police.
Despite a massive police search and maximum publicity in the newspapers
over the following days, not a single person seemed to have seen Diana after
she left the cricket green. Detective Chief Inspector Jack Goodsall of Kent
Police made extensive enquiries about the missing girl. He found out that
she was highly intelligent and efficient in her work; had a strong interest
in wildlife and the local countryside, and often went walking alone. Men
found her attractive but were sometimes rebuffed by her cool manner. She
had two regular boyfriends and enjoyed attending parties and social gatherings
in pubs with both of them.
One week later, on 27 July, a retired prison officer out walking his dog
found a naked female body in an orchard on Eastlands Farm, less than a mile
from the cricket green. Goodsall rushed to the scene and was shown the body,
lying at the bottom of a ditch, face down. He noticed that the ditch was
overgrown with long grass which was dry and yellowing. The autopsy report
later described a well nourished, slim young woman 5 feet 1 inch (1.55 metres)
in height with 'considerable larval infestation'. There was also evidence
of sexual assault, and the pathologist found extensive deep bruising around
her neck, particularly over the left side and at the back, which he felt
was consistent with manual strangulation.
Within a few hours the body was identified as that of Diana Davidson. The
hunt for a missing girl now became a hunt for a murderer.
Goodsall's men searched the immediate area and soon found a fawn cardigan
and a pair of open sandals, and close by Diana's orange and pink-striped
dress, a pair of pants and a brassiere. Lab tests confirmed that the clothes
had been forcibly torn from her body. Near the clothes was also a length
of braid, knotted at both ends and similar to the braid used for piping
dressing gowns. Earth and grass samples from the murder scene and a blood
sample from Diana, with the scrapings from under her fingernails, also went
to the forensic laboratory for further examination. Goodsall also set up
an incident room at a local school a mile and a half from Eastlands Farm.
Detectives now fanned out and made extensive inquiries about Diana's movements
on 20 July 1969. It was fairly obvious that she had been sexually assaulted
and murdered on that day, possibly shortly after she had left the cricket
match.
On 3 August, a week after the body had been found, police reconstructed
the events of 20 July. All the people who were at the cricket match and
many members of the public who were in the area were assembled in the village.
At 5.30pm that evening, WPC Susan Lane wore an identical mini-dress and
walked a timed route from the cricket green to the orchard where Diana's
body had been found. The Woman Police Constable also wore a wig of shoulder-length
dark hair, and she so strongly resembled the dead girl that many of Diana's
friends present were visibly upset. The event attracted nation-wide publicity,
and was helpful in that afterwards several people came forward to state
that they remembered seeing Diana Davidson walking off the main road towards
the entrance to Eastlands Farm, near a number of houses.
The police forensic science lab then reported that they had found three
spots of blood on the brassiere. Two of them were Diana's own group (O/MN)
but the third spot was classified as O/N, and blood on her dress was found
to be of the same group. The field of suspects had suddenly narrowed - only
10.3 per cent of Britain's population have blood of group O/N. It was the
vital clue; what Americans call "a smoking gun".
In the course of earlier house-to-house inquiry detectives had interviewed
a 31-year-old bachelor named Roy Andrew Thomas Carter. He had moved to Paddock
Wood a few months earlier, and was something of a loner. He had been orphaned
at an early age and had been raised by the local authority and then trained
at a farm school in animal husbandry. Carter had a passionate love for animals
and country life and would talk freely on these subjects, but was very coy
when women or sex were discussed. He lived by himself near the Eastlands
Farm, where he was often employed in part-time work. And his alibi for the
murder proved to be a lie: Carter stated that he was with neighbours on
that day, but it soon became apparent that they were away on holiday on
20 July.
A farm manager named Harry Cox, who lived in a cottage on the farm and close
to the ditch, remembered a man resembling Carter calling on him at 6pm on
20 July and asking for directions to Charlton Lane. Cox did not know of
this road, and the caller walked away. A few minutes later Cox saw the man
walking back down the path and following an attractive young girl wearing
a mini-dress. This was obviously Diana Davidson. Carter was included in
a second group of people for blood samples, which were obtained on 10 August.
Laboratory analysis proved his blood to be Group O/N.
Two detectives who re-interviewed Carter noticed a piece of braid, similar
to that found in the ditch, which was being used to tether a dog to a stake.
They searched Carter's rented apartment and found another piece of the same
braid tucked under a mattress.
Carter was taken to the incident room and at first flatly denied murdering
Ms Davidson; but patient questioning eventually revealed the truth. He stated
he had met Diana on the path, and that after a brief chat, she had taken
her dress off and invited him to have sex with her. This was a cynical and
blatant lie. Diana Davidson was not in the habit of coupling with complete
strangers in the open air, or anywhere else for that matter.
When detectives firmly told him that fact, Carter broke down and made a
full confession. He now stated that when he had passed Ms Davidson on the
footpath he had said to her, "Good evening, miss. Looks like we are
going to have some good fruit this year."
Carter said that Diana had replied, "What do you know about it, you
stupid bastard?"
As she turned away, Carter had grabbed her, enraged at her rude manner,
and carried her to the orchard. Being a foot taller than her and much stronger,
he was easily able to overpower the young girl. He began to strangle her
to stop her screaming as they struggled, and they both fell into the ditch.
He then ripped her dress off and removed her brassiere and pants before
raping her.
As he killed Ms Davidson by strangulation, he heard someone passing by on
the path above, and swiftly hid himself and the body from view. When the
man had passed by, he hurried away from the scene. He concluded his statement:
"Since this happened I have been very sorry and very upset. It wouldn't
have happened if she hadn't called me a bastard, which I am not."
On Carter's face were scratch marks that matched the flesh found under Diana's
fingernails. She had died fighting and marked her killer before she expired.
The case was a triumph for forensic science. It was the first time in British
criminal history that a blood spot had led straight to a murderer.
At his trial Roy Carter pleaded not guilty to murder but guilty of manslaughter.
His plea was not accepted by the Crown, and following a short trial, he
was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He walked
out of Maidstone Prison in the summer of 1980. Carter had served his sentence,
but now had a criminal record - he was branded for life as a convicted rapist
and killer.
(Research, 'A walk from cricket to murder' by Tom Tullett, Grafton Books)
Classical Classic
With thanks to John McVey.
The recital last evening in the chamber music room
of the Erawan Hotel by U.S. Pianist Myron Kropp, the first appearance
of Mr. Kropp in Bangkok, can only be described by this reviewer and those
who witnessed Mr. Kropp's performance as one of the most interesting experiences
in a very long time.
A hush fell over the room as Mr. Kropp appeared from the right of the
stage, attired in black formal evening-wear with a small white poppy in
his lapel. With sparse, sandy hair, a sallow complexion and a deceptively
frail looking frame, the man who has re-popularized Johann Sebastian Bach
approached the Baldwin Concert Grand, bowed to the audience and placed
himself upon the stool.
It might be appropriate to insert at this juncture that many pianists,
including Mr. Kropp, prefer a bench, maintaining that on a screw-type
stool, they sometimes find themselves turning sideways during a particularly
expressive strain. There was a slight delay, in fact, as Mr Kropp left
the stage briefly, apparently in search of a bench, but returned when
informed that there was none.
As I have mentioned on several other occasions, the Baldwin Concert Grand,
while basically a fine instrument, needs constant attention, particularly
in a climate such as Bangkok. This is even more true when the instrument
is as old as the one provided in the chamber music room of the Erawan
Hotel. In this humidity, the felts which separate the white keys from
the black tend to swell, causing an occasional key to stick, which apparently
was the case last evening with the D in the second octave.
During the "raging storm" section of the D-Minor Toccata and
Fugue, Mr. Kropp must be complimented for putting up with the awkward
D. However, by the time the "storm" was past and he had gotten
into the Prelude and Fugue in D Major, in which the second octave D plays
a major role, Mr. Kropp's patience was wearing thin.
Some who attended the performance later questioned whether the awkward
key justified some of the language which was heard coming from the stage
during softer passages of the fugue. However, one member of the audience,
who had sent his children out of the room by the midway point of the fugue,
had a valid point when he commented over the music and extemporaneous
remarks of Mr. Kropp that the workman who had greased the stool might
have done better to use some of the grease on the second octave D. Indeed,
Mr.. Kropp's stool had more than enough grease and during one passage
in which the music and lyrics were both particularly violent, Mr. Kropp
was turned completely around. Whereas before his remarks had been aimed
largely at the piano and were therefore somewhat muted, to his surprise
and that of those in the chamber music room he found himself addressing
himself directly to the audience.
But such things do happen, and the person who began to laugh deserves
to be severely reprimanded for this undignified behavior. Unfortunately,
laughter is contagious, and by the time it had subsided and the audience
had regained its composure Mr. Kropp appeared somewhat shaken. Nevertheless,
he swiveled himself back into position facing the piano and, leaving the
D Major Fugue unfinished, commenced on the Fantasia and Fugue in G Minor.
Why the concert grand piano's G key in the third octave chose that particular
time to begin sticking I hesitate to guess. However, it is certainly safe
to say that Mr. Kropp himself did nothing to help matters when he began
using his feet to kick the lower portion of the piano instead of operating
the pedals as is generally done.
Possibly it was this jarring or the un-Bach-like hammering to which the
sticking keyboard was being subjected. Something caused the right front
leg of the piano to buckle slightly inward, leaving the entire instrument
listing at approximately a 35-degree angle from that which is normal.
A gasp went up from the audience, for if the piano had actually fallen
several of Mr. Kropp's toes if not both his feet, would surely have been
broken.
It was with a sigh of relief therefore, that the audience saw Mr. Kropp
slowly rise from his stool and leave the stage. A few men in the back
of the room began clapping and when Mr. Kropp reappeared a moment later
it seemed he was responding to the ovation. Apparently, however, he had
left to get a red-handled fire ax which was hung back stage in case of
fire, for that was what was in his hand.
My first reaction at seeing Mr. Kropp begin to chop at the left leg of
the grand piano was that he was attempting to make it tilt at the same
angle as the right leg and thereby correct the list. However, when the
weakened legs finally collapsed altogether with a great crash and Mr.
Kropp continued to chop, it became obvious to all that he had no intention
of going on with the concert.
The ushers, who had heard the snapping of piano wires and splintering
of sounding board from the dining room, came rushing in and, with the
help of the hotel manager, two Indian watchmen and a passing police corporal,
finally succeeded in disarming Mr. Kropp and dragging him off the stage.
Note: This article has to be one of the all-time champs for the widest
and most frequent dissemination. It was written by Kenneth Langbell and
first appeared in the English-language version of the Bangkok Post under
the title "Wild Night at The Erawan" on 27 May 1967, and it
has been printed and re-printed in newspapers all over the world for more
than thirty years now. The article often appears as "A Humid Recital
Stirs Bangkok," attributed to Los Angeles Times music critic Martin
Bernheimer (who apparently popularized it in his column), and sportswriter
Joe Gilmartin of The Phoenix Gazette has turned it into a holiday tradition
by running it every Christmas time since the early 1970s.
Alas, this piece is simply a bit of humorous fiction, one of Kenneth Langbell's
weekly satirical humor columns intended as a send-up of pompous reviews.
The Bangkok Post has received numerous questions, comments, and complaints
about the article over the years, including "a plaintive query from
the makers of the unfortunate piano, concerning all the negative publicity
stemming from the original Post."
|
Features
this month
regulars
stories
sports
golf
funnies
back issues
|